Cynthia Pearson

Presented at the Annual Conference of the Asociation for the Study of Dreams
Santa Fe, New Mexico

In May, 1989, Dr. Marcia Emery published an article in Dream Network Bulletin on "Programming the Precognitive Dream." A subsequent study appeared in the ASD Newsletter in July, 1991. Also in 1989, Susan M. Watkins published Dreaming Myself, Dreaming a Town (Kendall & Delisle Books). The author, the editor of a small town newspaper, invited readers to send in their dreams. Her book recounts many remarkable interconnections among dreams and dreamers, including one striking example of community precognition.

Because precognition of news items had been a consistent feature of my own dream records, I decided to adapt Dr. Emery's procedure for use with the dream awareness classes I was teaching at the community college. The results were exciting to both my students and myself, and I wondered if such an experiment could be conducted with a larger population. In February, 1992, I was scheduled to give a talk at a bookstore on behalf of my newly published book, The Practical Psychic. I decided to capitalize on the opportunity to approach a (more or less) general public.

More than 100 people came to my talk. I invited audience members to participate in the experiment by following the guidelines on the forms provided. I had brought 50 forms for the dream experiment and all were distributed. Participants were to write down their dreams and mail them to the bookstore by February 28th. The target was the front page news of The Pittsburgh Press on Sunday, March 1.

Four volunteers judged the entries. There were 13 appropriately postmarked responses which recounted 25 dreams in all. When judges felt a dream contained precognitive content, they scored it as either a "hit" or a "partial hit." There were several dreams which every judge graded a "hit."

There were other provocative hits and partial hits. For example, most judges felt this short dream -- "a large dog vigorously guarding something"-- corresponded to a story on Saddam Hussein's refusal to scrap Scud manufacturing facilities. Another brief one, "about a hotel and a warning," seemed to preview a story that the county's Housing Authority had been threatened with "enforcement procedures" by HUD. In fact, only 8 dreams were judged by all to have no content that correlated to the front page news.

These "official" results were supplemented by unexpected effects. The night after my talk, I mentioned the bookstore experiment to my dream class. One student went home that night and dreamt of a "female who has died during an operation...a man places into my palm something they have removed from her body. It's about the size of two kidney beans, but a dull flesh color...this looks like...a brain. I put this in a clear tube..." The dreamer thought nothing of this dream until she saw page 1 of the Press that Sunday, and read that the county coroner's office was providing scientific researchers with "sections of brains removed during autopsies."

Newspapers are public, objective and literal; dreams are private, subjective, and symbolic. Subsequent conversations with some dreamers revealed compelling synchronicities suggesting that their dreams included material that was personally "newsworthy." I found these tangential experiences as provocative as the judges' findings. If nothing else, this public experiment in precognitive dreaming affirms that the more we pay attention, the more we discover how dreams intertwine with and illuminate our daily lives.

It only made sense to try this with a newspaper audience. In the next experiment, a newspaper columnist invited his readers to participate.

Dream Journalist Home Page

Copyright 2017 Cynthia Pearson